{"id":3136,"date":"2026-09-14T09:03:41","date_gmt":"2026-09-14T09:03:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/?p=3136"},"modified":"2026-09-14T09:03:43","modified_gmt":"2026-09-14T09:03:43","slug":"devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/","title":{"rendered":"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Security is no longer something organizations can afford to address only after an application has been developed or a security alert has appeared. Modern engineering teams need security throughout the software lifecycle, while security teams need strong operational processes for detecting, investigating, and responding to threats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is where DevSecOps<\/strong> and SecOps<\/strong> come into the picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The two terms are closely related, but they solve different problems. DevSecOps focuses on building security into software development and delivery<\/strong>, while SecOps focuses on operational security monitoring, detection, investigation, and response<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A mature organization generally does not choose one over the other. Instead, DevSecOps and SecOps work together across different parts of the technology and security lifecycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

DevSecOps vs SecOps at a Glance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Area<\/th>DevSecOps<\/th>SecOps<\/th><\/tr>
Full form<\/td>Development, Security and Operations<\/td>Security Operations<\/td><\/tr>
Primary focus<\/td>Secure software development and delivery<\/td>Security monitoring and incident response<\/td><\/tr>
Main environment<\/td>SDLC, CI\/CD, cloud and application platforms<\/td>Security operations, infrastructure, endpoints, networks and cloud<\/td><\/tr>
Main objective<\/td>Prevent vulnerabilities from reaching production<\/td>Detect and respond to security threats<\/td><\/tr>
Typical teams<\/td>Developers, DevOps, security engineers, platform teams<\/td>SOC analysts, incident responders, threat hunters, security engineers<\/td><\/tr>
Security approach<\/td>Shift-left and continuous security<\/td>Continuous detection and response<\/td><\/tr>
Common activities<\/td>SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC scanning, container scanning<\/td>SIEM monitoring, EDR, alert triage, threat hunting, incident response<\/td><\/tr>
Primary question<\/td>“Can we build and deploy this securely?”<\/td>“Are we under attack, and what should we do?”<\/td><\/tr>
Typical outcome<\/td>More secure applications and infrastructure<\/td>Faster detection, investigation and containment<\/td><\/tr>
Time orientation<\/td>Before and throughout deployment<\/td>During and after security events, plus continuous monitoring<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The important point is that DevSecOps is not a replacement for SecOps, and SecOps is not a replacement for DevSecOps<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They overlap, but their responsibilities are different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

What Is DevSecOps?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

DevSecOps<\/strong> integrates security practices into the DevOps lifecycle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Traditional development models often treated security as a separate phase. Developers built the application, operations deployed it, and security teams reviewed it later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That approach creates a predictable problem: vulnerabilities can be discovered late, when fixing them is more expensive and disruptive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DevSecOps changes the workflow by making security a shared responsibility across development, operations, and security teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A simplified DevSecOps lifecycle looks like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Plan\n  \u2193\nCode\n  \u2193\nBuild\n  \u2193\nTest\n  \u2193\nSecurity Validation\n  \u2193\nPackage\n  \u2193\nDeploy\n  \u2193\nOperate\n  \u2193\nMonitor\n  \u2193\nFeedback\n  \u21ba<\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n
Security controls can be introduced throughout this lifecycle instead of waiting for a final security review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
What Does DevSecOps Actually Do?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
DevSecOps can include activities such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  • Secure coding practices<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Source-code security analysis<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Dependency and software composition analysis<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Secret detection<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Container image scanning<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Infrastructure-as-Code scanning<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Dynamic application security testing<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • API security testing<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Cloud configuration checks<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Vulnerability management<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Security gates in CI\/CD pipelines<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Software supply-chain security<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Security testing before production<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Security monitoring after deployment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
    For example, suppose a developer adds a vulnerable third-party library to an application.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    A DevSecOps pipeline might identify that dependency during the build process and prevent the release from progressing until the issue is reviewed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    The objective is not simply to generate a security report. The objective is to find and address security problems as close as practical to where they are introduced<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    \n\n\n\n
    What Is SecOps?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
    SecOps<\/strong>, short for Security Operations, is the operational side of cybersecurity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    SecOps teams are responsible for continuously watching an organization’s technology environment for suspicious activity and responding when threats are identified.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    A typical SecOps workflow looks like:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    Security Events\n      \u2193\nCollection\n      \u2193\nDetection\n      \u2193\nAlert Triage\n      \u2193\nInvestigation\n      \u2193\nContainment\n      \u2193\nEradication \/ Remediation\n      \u2193\nRecovery\n      \u2193\nLessons Learned<\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n
    SecOps commonly operates through or alongside a Security Operations Center (SOC)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
    The exact structure varies between organizations, but responsibilities often include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    • Security monitoring<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Alert investigation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Incident response<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Threat detection<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Threat hunting<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Endpoint monitoring<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Network monitoring<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Identity monitoring<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Log analysis<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • SIEM management<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • EDR\/XDR operations<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Vulnerability response<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Security automation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Forensics and investigation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Security incident documentation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
      \n\n\n\n
      The Main Difference Between DevSecOps and SecOps<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
      The easiest way to understand the difference is to look at where each discipline operates in the security lifecycle<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
      DevSecOps asks:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
      \n
      How can we prevent security weaknesses from being introduced or deployed?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
      SecOps asks:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
      \n
      How can we detect, investigate and respond when suspicious activity occurs?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
      Consider an application deployed to the cloud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
      DevSecOps might:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
        \n
      1. Scan its source code.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. Check third-party dependencies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      3. Scan the container image.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      4. Validate Kubernetes or Terraform configurations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      5. Check for exposed secrets.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      6. Apply security controls to the CI\/CD pipeline.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      7. Validate the deployment before production.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
        SecOps might:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          \n
        1. Monitor authentication activity.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        2. Detect unusual access patterns.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        3. Investigate suspicious API calls.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        4. Analyze endpoint alerts.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        5. Correlate logs in a SIEM.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        6. Contain compromised workloads.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        7. Investigate the incident.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        8. Coordinate recovery.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
          Both protect the same organization, but they approach security from different operational positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          \n\n\n\n
          DevSecOps and SecOps Are Complementary<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
          It is tempting to think of security as a linear process:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          DevSecOps \u2192 Deploy \u2192 SecOps<\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n
          Real environments are more circular.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          A production incident discovered by SecOps can provide information that improves DevSecOps controls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          For example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          Developer\n   \u2193\nDevSecOps Security Controls\n   \u2193\nCI\/CD\n   \u2193\nProduction\n   \u2193\nSecOps Monitoring\n   \u2193\nSecurity Incident\n   \u2193\nRoot Cause Analysis\n   \u2193\nNew Security Control\n   \u2193\nDevSecOps Pipeline<\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n
          Suppose SecOps discovers that an application is repeatedly receiving malicious requests through a particular API endpoint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          The response should not necessarily stop at blocking the immediate attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
          The organization may also:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
            \n
          • improve API security testing,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • add a new detection rule,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • update application security requirements,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • improve authentication controls,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • add automated tests,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • change deployment policies,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
          • improve logging.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
            This feedback loop is one of the strongest ways to connect DevSecOps and SecOps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
            \n\n\n\n
            Key Responsibilities of DevSecOps<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
            1. Secure the Development Lifecycle<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
            Security requirements should be considered during planning and design, not only after code has been written.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
            Teams can perform:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
              \n
            • Threat modeling<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • Security architecture reviews<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • Secure design reviews<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • Abuse-case analysis<\/li>\n\n\n\n
            • Security acceptance criteria<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
              The earlier a serious design flaw is discovered, the easier it generally is to address.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
              \n\n\n\n
              2. Secure Source Code<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
              Security tooling can inspect source code for potentially dangerous patterns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
              Examples include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                \n
              • Injection vulnerabilities<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • Unsafe authentication logic<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • Improper input validation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • Hard-coded credentials<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • Insecure cryptographic usage<\/li>\n\n\n\n
              • Authorization mistakes<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                This is commonly associated with Static Application Security Testing (SAST)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                \n\n\n\n
                3. Secure Dependencies<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                Modern applications rarely consist entirely of internally written code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                They depend on:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                  \n
                • Open-source libraries<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • Frameworks<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • Container images<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • Package managers<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • Cloud services<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                • Build tools<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                  Software Composition Analysis (SCA) can help identify known vulnerabilities in dependencies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                  However, simply installing an SCA scanner is not enough. Teams also need a sensible process for determining which findings actually require action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                  \n\n\n\n
                  4. Secure Infrastructure<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                  DevSecOps increasingly extends beyond application source code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                  Infrastructure definitions such as Terraform, Kubernetes manifests and cloud configuration can introduce security weaknesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                  Security checks can identify issues such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                    \n
                  • Excessive permissions<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • Publicly exposed resources<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • Insecure storage configurations<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • Weak network rules<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • Missing encryption<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                  • Unsafe container configurations<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                    \n\n\n\n
                    5. Secure the CI\/CD Pipeline<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                    The pipeline itself is part of the organization’s attack surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                    A secure pipeline should consider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                      \n
                    • Build permissions<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Secrets<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Credentials<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Artifact integrity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Dependency sources<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Runner security<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Access control<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Audit logging<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                    • Pipeline isolation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                      A highly secure application deployed through a compromised build pipeline is still a serious security risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                      \n\n\n\n
                      Key Responsibilities of SecOps<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                      1. Continuous Monitoring<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                      SecOps collects and analyzes security-relevant telemetry from systems such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                        \n
                      • Servers<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • Endpoints<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • Cloud platforms<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • Applications<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • Firewalls<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • Identity providers<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • Network devices<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • SaaS platforms<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                      • Containers and workloads<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                        The goal is to create enough visibility to detect meaningful threats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                        \n\n\n\n
                        2. Alert Detection and Triage<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                        Security systems can generate large numbers of alerts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                        The challenge is not simply creating more alerts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                        The real challenge is determining:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                        Which alerts represent meaningful risk?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
                        SecOps teams typically prioritize alerts according to factors such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                          \n
                        • Severity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        • Asset importance<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        • User identity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        • Attack indicators<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        • Business impact<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        • Confidence of detection<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                        • Context from other events<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                          \n\n\n\n
                          3. Incident Response<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                          When an actual incident is confirmed, SecOps may coordinate:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                            \n
                          • Investigation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Containment<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Evidence collection<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Credential revocation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Host isolation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Malicious process termination<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Network blocking<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Eradication<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Recovery<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                          • Post-incident analysis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                            The exact response depends heavily on the incident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                            A compromised developer laptop and a compromised production database should not be handled in exactly the same way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                            \n\n\n\n
                            4. Threat Hunting<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                            Not every attack produces a reliable automated alert.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                            Threat hunting involves proactively searching available telemetry for suspicious behavior that existing detections may have missed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                            This requires understanding:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                              \n
                            • Attack techniques<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                            • Normal system behavior<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                            • Identity activity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                            • Network patterns<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                            • Endpoint behavior<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                            • Cloud activity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                            • Application telemetry<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                              Threat hunting is therefore different from simply waiting for alerts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                              \n\n\n\n
                              Where Do DevSecOps and SecOps Overlap?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                              There is considerable overlap between the two disciplines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                              Capability<\/th>DevSecOps<\/th>SecOps<\/th><\/tr>
                              Vulnerability management<\/td>\u2713<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr>
                              Cloud security<\/td>\u2713<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr>
                              Application security<\/td>\u2713<\/td>Sometimes<\/td><\/tr>
                              Security monitoring<\/td>Sometimes<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr>
                              Incident response<\/td>Sometimes<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr>
                              Threat detection<\/td>Sometimes<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr>
                              Secure CI\/CD<\/td>\u2713<\/td>Usually supporting role<\/td><\/tr>
                              Security automation<\/td>\u2713<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr>
                              Logging<\/td>\u2713<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr>
                              Threat modeling<\/td>\u2713<\/td>Sometimes<\/td><\/tr>
                              Security testing<\/td>\u2713<\/td>Sometimes<\/td><\/tr>
                              Threat hunting<\/td>Usually no<\/td>\u2713<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
                              The exact boundary depends on the organization’s structure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                              A smaller company may have one security engineering team performing responsibilities that would be separated into DevSecOps and SecOps teams at a large enterprise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                              \n\n\n\n
                              DevSecOps vs SecOps: Tools<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                              The tools are not fixed categories. A mature security program often shares data and automation across both areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                              DevSecOps Tool Categories<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                              Common categories include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                \n
                              • SAST<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • DAST<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • SCA<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • Secret scanning<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • Container scanning<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • IaC security scanning<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • API security testing<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • Kubernetes security<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • Cloud security posture management<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                              • Software supply-chain security tools<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                Examples might include tools such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                  \n
                                • Semgrep<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                • SonarQube<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                • Snyk<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                • Trivy<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                • Checkov<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                • OWASP ZAP<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                  The specific choice should depend on the technology stack and the organization’s requirements rather than tool popularity alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                  SecOps Tool Categories<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                  SecOps commonly works with:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                    \n
                                  • SIEM<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • EDR<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • XDR<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • SOAR<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • Network detection tools<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • Threat intelligence platforms<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • Vulnerability management platforms<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • Identity security tools<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                  • Cloud security monitoring platforms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                    Examples include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                      \n
                                    • Microsoft Sentinel<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                    • Splunk<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                    • Elastic Security<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                    • Microsoft Defender<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                    • CrowdStrike<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                    • Palo Alto Networks security platforms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                      Again, the tool is only one component. Poor detection engineering, excessive alert noise or insufficient operational ownership can undermine an otherwise capable security platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                      \n\n\n\n
                                      A Practical Example<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                      Imagine a company operates an e-commerce application using:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                        \n
                                      • Git<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                      • CI\/CD<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                      • Docker<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                      • Kubernetes<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                      • Public cloud infrastructure<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                      • Managed databases<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                      • Centralized logging<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                        A customer-facing API has been developed and is ready for release.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                        DevSecOps Perspective<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                        Before deployment, the pipeline could:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                          \n
                                        1. Scan source code.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        2. Scan dependencies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        3. Detect exposed secrets.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        4. Scan the Docker image.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        5. Check Kubernetes manifests.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        6. Run security tests.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        7. Validate deployment configuration.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        8. Require review for critical findings.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                        9. Deploy using controlled credentials.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
                                          The goal is to reduce the probability that a known security weakness reaches production.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                          SecOps Perspective<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                          After deployment, SecOps could:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                            \n
                                          1. Monitor authentication events.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                          2. Monitor API behavior.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                          3. Detect suspicious network activity.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                          4. Correlate cloud and application logs.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                          5. Investigate unusual administrator actions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                          6. Detect possible account compromise.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                          7. Isolate affected workloads if necessary.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                          8. Coordinate incident response.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
                                            The goal is to identify and respond to threats that actually occur in the running environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                            \n\n\n\n
                                            What Happens When DevSecOps and SecOps Work in Isolation?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                            This is where many organizations struggle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                            Problem 1: DevSecOps Finds Vulnerabilities but Nobody Prioritizes Them<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                            A pipeline may produce hundreds of security findings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                            If developers receive a massive report without context, many findings will be ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                            A better approach is to prioritize findings using factors such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                              \n
                                            • Exploitability<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                            • Asset exposure<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                            • Business criticality<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                            • Reachability<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                            • Runtime context<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                            • Availability of a fix<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                              \n\n\n\n
                                              Problem 2: SecOps Detects an Attack but Development Never Learns From It<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                              Suppose SecOps detects exploitation of an application vulnerability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                              If the incident is simply closed after remediation, the organization loses an opportunity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                              The detection should feed back into engineering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                              Possible improvements include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                \n
                                              • New security tests<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                              • New CI\/CD checks<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                              • Better application logging<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                              • Improved authentication<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                              • New detection rules<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                              • Updated threat models<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                \n\n\n\n
                                                Problem 3: Security Creates Controls That Developers Cannot Operate<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                                A security control that blocks every deployment can create resistance from engineering teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                Security controls need to be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                  \n
                                                • Risk-based<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                • Explainable<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                • Automatable<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                • Maintainable<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                • Appropriate to the application<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                  A critical production vulnerability may justify a release block.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                  A low-risk informational finding usually should not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                  \n\n\n\n
                                                  Shift Left Does Not Mean “Only Shift Left”<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                  One common misunderstanding is that DevSecOps makes production monitoring less important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                  That is incorrect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                  No matter how strong pre-production testing becomes, production systems remain exposed to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    \n
                                                  • Zero-day vulnerabilities<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                  • Misconfigurations<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                  • Credential theft<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                  • Insider threats<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                  • Supply-chain compromise<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                  • Newly discovered attack techniques<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                  • Operational mistakes<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                  • Previously unknown attack paths<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                    This is why preventive security and detective security must coexist<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    A useful model is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                 PREVENT\n                \u2502\n                \u25bc\n        DevSecOps Controls\n                \u2502\n                \u25bc\n             DEPLOY\n                \u2502\n                \u25bc\n          PRODUCTION\n                \u2502\n                \u25bc\n             DETECT\n                \u2502\n                \u25bc\n         SecOps Monitoring\n                \u2502\n                \u25bc\n            RESPOND\n                \u2502\n                \u25bc\n          LEARN \/ IMPROVE\n                \u2502\n                \u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u25ba DevSecOps<\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n
                                                    This is more realistic than treating security as a single stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    \n\n\n\n
                                                    DevSecOps vs SecOps: Which One Should an Organization Choose?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                    For most organizations, the answer is both<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    The better question is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    \n
                                                    Where should each capability sit, and how should information move between them?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
                                                    A software-heavy organization with weak application security may need to strengthen DevSecOps first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    An organization experiencing frequent security incidents or lacking centralized monitoring may need to strengthen SecOps first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    A mature enterprise generally needs both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                    \n\n\n\n
                                                    When DevSecOps Is the Bigger Priority<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                    DevSecOps should receive strong attention when:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                      \n
                                                    • Software is released frequently.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • Development teams manage their own deployments.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • Cloud infrastructure changes rapidly.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • Open-source dependencies are heavily used.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • Security defects are discovered late.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • CI\/CD pipelines lack security controls.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • Infrastructure is defined as code.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • Security reviews are slowing releases.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                    • Developers lack actionable security feedback.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                      The goal should not be “scan everything.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                      The goal should be to make secure engineering part of the normal development workflow<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                      \n\n\n\n
                                                      When SecOps Is the Bigger Priority<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                      SecOps becomes especially important when:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                        \n
                                                      • The organization has a large production environment.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                      • Security telemetry is fragmented.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                      • Alerts are not investigated consistently.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                      • Incident response is slow.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                      • There is limited visibility into endpoint or cloud activity.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                      • Security incidents are discovered by external parties.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                      • The organization needs continuous monitoring.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                      • Regulatory or business requirements demand stronger detection and response capabilities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                        In these environments, the organization needs operational visibility and a reliable response process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                        \n\n\n\n
                                                        How DevSecOps and SecOps Should Work Together<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                        A strong operating model creates explicit feedback loops.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                        1. Share Security Findings<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                        DevSecOps should make relevant application and infrastructure findings available to security operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                        2. Share Production Intelligence<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                        SecOps should provide development and platform teams with useful information about:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                          \n
                                                        • Attack patterns<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                        • Exploited vulnerabilities<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                        • Suspicious behavior<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                        • Detection gaps<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                        • Incident root causes<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                          3. Automate Where the Risk Justifies It<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                          Examples include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                            \n
                                                          • Automatically opening security tickets<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                          • Automatically enriching alerts<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                          • Blocking known malicious artifacts<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                          • Isolating compromised endpoints<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                          • Preventing deployment of critical known vulnerabilities<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                          • Rotating exposed credentials<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                            Automation should be controlled carefully. Automatically blocking legitimate production activity can create its own operational incident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                            4. Establish Shared Ownership<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                            Security should not become an isolated department that simply says “no.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                            Likewise, engineering should not treat security findings as someone else’s problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                            The strongest model creates shared responsibility while keeping accountability clear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                            \n\n\n\n
                                                            Metrics That Actually Matter<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                            Counting security tools or the number of vulnerabilities found does not tell you whether the program is effective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                            More useful DevSecOps metrics can include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                              \n
                                                            • Percentage of repositories covered by security testing<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                            • Critical vulnerabilities reaching production<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                            • Time to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                            • Percentage of secrets detected before deployment<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                            • Security findings by severity and age<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                            • Percentage of infrastructure covered by policy checks<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                              Useful SecOps metrics can include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                \n
                                                              • Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                              • Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                              • Alert investigation time<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                              • Detection coverage<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                              • False-positive rate<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                              • Incident containment time<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                              • Number of recurring incident types<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                              • Percentage of incidents with documented root-cause analysis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                                Even these metrics need context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                For example, reducing alert volume is not necessarily an improvement if important detections were simply disabled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                \n\n\n\n
                                                                Common Mistakes<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                                Treating DevSecOps as a Security Scanner<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                                                Adding a scanner to a CI\/CD pipeline does not automatically create DevSecOps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                DevSecOps also involves:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  \n
                                                                • Ownership<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                • Security requirements<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                • Developer workflows<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                • Risk-based policies<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                • Remediation processes<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                • Secure architecture<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                • Feedback loops<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  \n\n\n\n
                                                                  Treating SecOps as an Alert-Handling Team<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  A mature SecOps function is more than responding to notifications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  It also requires:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    \n
                                                                  • Detection engineering<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  • Threat intelligence<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  • Investigation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  • Threat hunting<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  • Incident learning<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  • Automation<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                  • Continuous improvement<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    \n\n\n\n
                                                                    Blocking Every Security Finding<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    Not every vulnerability deserves the same response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    Security teams should distinguish between:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      \n
                                                                    • Critical exploitable issues<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    • High-risk weaknesses<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    • Medium-risk findings<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    • Low-risk findings<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    • False positives<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                    • Accepted risks<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      Risk-based decisions are more sustainable than treating every scanner result equally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      \n\n\n\n
                                                                      Ignoring Production Context<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      A vulnerability in an isolated development system is not necessarily equivalent to the same vulnerability in an internet-facing production service containing sensitive business data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      Risk depends on context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      \n\n\n\n
                                                                      Using Too Many Tools<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      More tools can create:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        \n
                                                                      • Duplicate findings<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      • Alert fatigue<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      • Integration complexity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      • Licensing costs<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      • Maintenance overhead<\/li>\n\n\n\n
                                                                      • Conflicting results<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        A smaller, well-integrated security toolchain is often more effective than a large collection of poorly connected products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        \n\n\n\n
                                                                        A Practical Maturity Model<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Organizations can think about DevSecOps and SecOps maturity in stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Stage 1 \u2014 Reactive<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Security is mostly handled after problems are discovered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Stage 2 \u2014 Basic Controls<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Some vulnerability scanning and security monitoring exist, but processes are inconsistent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Stage 3 \u2014 Integrated<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Security controls become part of CI\/CD, while SecOps has centralized monitoring and incident processes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Stage 4 \u2014 Risk-Based<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Security findings are prioritized according to exploitability, business impact and operational context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Stage 5 \u2014 Continuous Security<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        DevSecOps and SecOps continuously exchange information, automate appropriate controls and improve security based on real production intelligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        The goal is not simply to reach the highest number of tools or security checks. The goal is to create a system that reduces meaningful risk without making engineering and operations unnecessarily difficult<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        \n\n\n\n
                                                                        Final Recommendation<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        DevSecOps and SecOps should not be viewed as competing approaches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        DevSecOps is primarily about building and delivering software securely. SecOps is primarily about protecting and operating the environment when software and infrastructure are running.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        A useful way to remember the distinction is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        \n
                                                                        DevSecOps helps prevent security problems from being introduced. SecOps helps detect and respond to security problems that make it through.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        The strongest security programs connect both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        DevSecOps should feed security-relevant information into production operations, while SecOps should feed real-world attack intelligence back into development and delivery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        That creates a continuous security loop:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        Secure Design\n     \u2193\nSecure Development\n     \u2193\nSecure Build\n     \u2193\nSecure Deployment\n     \u2193\nProduction Monitoring\n     \u2193\nDetection\n     \u2193\nResponse\n     \u2193\nRoot Cause Analysis\n     \u2193\nSecurity Improvements\n     \u21ba<\/code><\/pre>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        That feedback loop is ultimately more valuable than the distinction between the two labels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
                                                                        If an organization can prevent common vulnerabilities, detect abnormal behavior quickly, respond effectively, and continuously learn from incidents, it has the foundation of a mature security operating model.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
                                                                        Security is no longer something organizations can afford to address only after an application has been developed or a security… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":3137,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-3136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nDevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles - DevSecOps School<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles - DevSecOps School\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Security is no longer something organizations can afford to address only after an application has been developed or a security...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"DevSecOps School\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-14T09:03:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-14T09:03:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/image-15.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"572\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Amelia Olivia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Amelia Olivia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Amelia Olivia\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5ff4d5d2ff886aa29536db0d8a0787d1\"},\"headline\":\"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-14T09:03:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-14T09:03:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2842,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/image-15.png\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/\",\"name\":\"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles - DevSecOps School\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/image-15.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-14T09:03:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-14T09:03:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5ff4d5d2ff886aa29536db0d8a0787d1\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/image-15.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/image-15.png\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":572},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"DevSecOps School\",\"description\":\"DevSecOps Redefined\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5ff4d5d2ff886aa29536db0d8a0787d1\",\"name\":\"Amelia Olivia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/86aec18083c8b8a8ca5aec5530fef69a4a2fe9d706774cf20e99fbaccf741608?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/86aec18083c8b8a8ca5aec5530fef69a4a2fe9d706774cf20e99fbaccf741608?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/86aec18083c8b8a8ca5aec5530fef69a4a2fe9d706774cf20e99fbaccf741608?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Amelia Olivia\"},\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/devsecopsschool.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/amelia\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles - DevSecOps School","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles - DevSecOps School","og_description":"Security is no longer something organizations can afford to address only after an application has been developed or a security...","og_url":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/","og_site_name":"DevSecOps School","article_published_time":"2026-09-14T09:03:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-14T09:03:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":572,"url":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/image-15.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Amelia Olivia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Amelia Olivia","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/"},"author":{"name":"Amelia Olivia","@id":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5ff4d5d2ff886aa29536db0d8a0787d1"},"headline":"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles","datePublished":"2026-09-14T09:03:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-14T09:03:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/"},"wordCount":2842,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/image-15.png","inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/","url":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/","name":"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles - DevSecOps School","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/image-15.png","datePublished":"2026-09-14T09:03:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-14T09:03:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5ff4d5d2ff886aa29536db0d8a0787d1"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/image-15.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/image-15.png","width":1024,"height":572},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/devsecops-vs-secops-understanding-their-roles\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DevSecOps vs SecOps: Understanding Their Roles"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/#website","url":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/","name":"DevSecOps School","description":"DevSecOps Redefined","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5ff4d5d2ff886aa29536db0d8a0787d1","name":"Amelia Olivia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/86aec18083c8b8a8ca5aec5530fef69a4a2fe9d706774cf20e99fbaccf741608?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/86aec18083c8b8a8ca5aec5530fef69a4a2fe9d706774cf20e99fbaccf741608?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/86aec18083c8b8a8ca5aec5530fef69a4a2fe9d706774cf20e99fbaccf741608?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Amelia Olivia"},"url":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/author\/amelia\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3136"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3138,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3136\/revisions\/3138"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3137"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3136"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/devsecopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=3136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}