Introduction & Overview
In the fast-paced world of software development, integrating security into the DevOps pipeline—termed DevSecOps—has become critical to delivering secure applications at speed. Containers, a cornerstone of modern DevOps, introduce unique security challenges, particularly in managing vulnerabilities within container images. Clair, an open-source vulnerability scanner, addresses these challenges by providing robust tools to monitor and secure container images, making it a vital component in DevSecOps workflows. This tutorial explores Clair’s role, architecture, setup, use cases, benefits, limitations, and best practices, equipping you with the knowledge to integrate it effectively into your DevSecOps pipeline.
What is Clair?
Clair is an open-source static analysis tool designed to identify vulnerabilities in container images (Docker and OCI formats). It scans container layers against known vulnerability databases, providing actionable insights to developers and security teams.
- Purpose: Detects security flaws in container images by analyzing each layer for known vulnerabilities.
- Developed by: CoreOS (now part of Red Hat), released in 2015.
- License: Apache 2.0, making it freely available for community and enterprise use.
History or Background
Clair was introduced by CoreOS in 2015 to address the growing need for container security as Docker adoption surged. With containers becoming integral to DevOps, the risk of deploying images with unpatched vulnerabilities increased. Clair filled this gap by offering a tool to scan container images layer-by-layer, leveraging vulnerability data from sources like the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database, Red Hat, Ubuntu, and Debian. In 2018, Red Hat acquired CoreOS, integrating Clair into its Quay container registry and OpenShift platform, enhancing its enterprise relevance.
Why is it Relevant in DevSecOps?
Clair aligns with the DevSecOps principle of “shift-left security,” embedding security early in the software development lifecycle (SDLC). Its relevance stems from:
- Container-Centric Security: Containers are ephemeral and layered, requiring specialized tools to scan for vulnerabilities at build time.
- Automation: Clair integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated vulnerability scanning.
- Shared Responsibility: By providing clear vulnerability reports, Clair empowers developers, security, and operations teams to collaborate on remediation.
- Compliance: Helps meet regulatory requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) by identifying and mitigating risks in containerized applications.

Core Concepts & Terminology
Key Terms and Definitions
- Container Image: A lightweight, executable package containing software, dependencies, and configurations.
- Vulnerability: A weakness in software that can be exploited, often listed in CVE databases.
- Layer: A container image is composed of layers, each representing changes (e.g., package installations).
- Static Analysis: Examining code or images without executing them to identify vulnerabilities.
- CVE Database: A standardized list of known vulnerabilities, used by Clair to cross-reference image contents.
- Quay: Red Hat’s container registry, often paired with Clair for image management.
Term | Description |
---|---|
Vulnerability | A known flaw or weakness in software, often cataloged in CVEs. |
Namespace | Clair’s logical segmentation of vulnerability data sources (e.g., Debian). |
Manifest | A container image representation, identifying layers and metadata. |
Indexing | The process of scanning and extracting features from container layers. |
Matching | Comparing indexed features to known vulnerabilities. |
How It Fits into the DevSecOps Lifecycle
Clair integrates into the DevSecOps lifecycle at multiple stages:
- Plan: Define security policies for container images (e.g., acceptable vulnerability severity).
- Code/Build: Scan images during the build process to catch vulnerabilities early.
- Test: Validate images in staging environments using Clair’s automated scans.
- Deploy: Ensure only vulnerability-free images are deployed to production.
- Monitor: Continuously check images for newly discovered vulnerabilities post-deployment.
DevSecOps Phase | Role of Clair |
---|---|
Build | Scan container images during build stage |
Test | Validate images with security tests |
Release | Block deployments with critical vulnerabilities |
Monitor | Continuously rescan for newly published CVEs |
Architecture & How It Works
Components
Clair’s architecture comprises:
- API Server: Handles requests to scan images and retrieve vulnerability reports.
- Database: Stores vulnerability metadata and scan results (supports PostgreSQL).
- Updater: Periodically fetches and updates vulnerability data from sources like CVE, Red Hat, Ubuntu, and Debian.
- Notifier: Sends alerts when new vulnerabilities are detected in previously scanned images.
Internal Workflow
- Image Submission: A container image is submitted via Clair’s API (e.g., from a CI/CD pipeline).
- Layer Analysis: Clair decomposes the image into layers, analyzing each for packages and dependencies.
- Vulnerability Matching: Packages are cross-referenced with vulnerability databases to identify risks.
- Report Generation: Clair produces a report listing vulnerabilities, their severity, and affected layers.
- Notification: If new vulnerabilities are found in existing images, notifications are sent via webhooks.

Architecture Diagram Description
Imagine a diagram with:
- A Client (e.g., CI/CD pipeline) sending an image to the Clair API Server.
- The API Server interacting with a PostgreSQL Database to store scan results.
- An Updater fetching data from external Vulnerability Databases (CVE, Red Hat, etc.).
- A Notifier sending alerts to a configured endpoint (e.g., Slack, email).
- Arrows showing data flow: Client → API Server → Database → Notifier.
+------------------+
| Container Image |
+--------+---------+
|
v
+--------+---------+ +--------------------+
| Indexer Service +----->+ Vulnerability DB |
+--------+---------+ +--------------------+
|
v
+--------+---------+
| Matcher Service |
+--------+---------+
|
v
+--------+---------+
| API + gRPC |
+------------------+
Integration Points with CI/CD or Cloud Tools
Clair integrates with:
- CI/CD Pipelines: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, or GitLab CI to scan images during builds.
- Container Registries: Quay, Docker Hub, or AWS ECR for automated image scanning.
- Kubernetes: Via Red Hat’s Container Security Operator in OpenShift.
- Notification Tools: Webhooks for Slack, email, or custom endpoints.
Installation & Getting Started
Basic Setup or Prerequisites
- System Requirements: Linux-based system, Docker, PostgreSQL (version 13+ recommended).
- Dependencies: Docker for running Clair, a container registry (e.g., Quay, Docker Hub).
- Network Access: Connectivity to vulnerability data sources (e.g., CVE feeds).
- Configuration: A YAML config file for Clair settings (e.g., database connection, updater schedule).
Hands-On: Step-by-Step Beginner-Friendly Setup Guide
This guide sets up Clair locally using Docker and PostgreSQL.
- Install Docker and PostgreSQL:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install docker.io postgresql
2. Start PostgreSQL:
sudo systemctl start postgresql
sudo -u postgres psql -c "CREATE DATABASE clair;"
3. Clone Clair Repository:
git clone https://github.com/quay/clair.git
cd clair
4. Create Configuration File (config.yaml
):
http_listen_addr: ":6060"
database:
type: pgsql
options:
source: host=localhost dbname=clair user=postgres password=your_password sslmode=disable
updater:
interval: 12h
5. Pull and Run Clair:
docker pull quay.io/projectquay/clair:latest
docker run -p 6060:6060 -v $(pwd)/config.yaml:/config/config.yaml quay.io/projectquay/clair:latest
6. Verify Clair is Running:
curl http://localhost:6060/health
Expect a response indicating Clair is healthy.
7. Scan a Container Image:
curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"ID": "sha256:example", "Path": "/path/to/image.tar"}' http://localhost:6060/v1/layers
curl http://localhost:6060/v1/layers/sha256:example/vulnerabilities?minimumPriority=Negligible
Note: Replace /path/to/image.tar
with an actual image tarball path.
Real-World Use Cases
- CI/CD Pipeline Integration:
- Scenario: A fintech company uses Jenkins to build Docker images. Clair is integrated to scan images before deployment, halting the pipeline if high-severity vulnerabilities (e.g., Heartbleed) are found.
- Industry: Finance, where compliance with PCI-DSS is critical.
- Kubernetes Deployment:
- Scenario: A healthcare provider uses Red Hat OpenShift with Clair via the Container Security Operator. Images in Quay are scanned, ensuring HIPAA-compliant deployments.
- Industry: Healthcare, requiring strict data protection.
- Continuous Monitoring:
- Scenario: An e-commerce platform uses Clair to monitor images in production. When a new CVE is published, Clair’s notifier alerts the team to patch affected images.
- Industry: Retail, needing rapid response to vulnerabilities.
- Open-Source Project Security:
- Scenario: An open-source project uses Clair in GitHub Actions to scan community-contributed images, ensuring secure distributions.
- Industry: Open-source software, emphasizing trust and reliability.
Benefits & Limitations
Key Advantages
- Early Vulnerability Detection: Identifies issues during build, reducing production risks.
- Automation-Friendly: Seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines and registries.
- Open-Source: Free, customizable, and community-supported.
- Comprehensive Database Support: Leverages multiple CVE sources for broad coverage.
Common Challenges or Limitations
- Static Analysis Only: Cannot detect runtime vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.
- Dependency on External Databases: Relies on timely updates from CVE sources.
- Resource Intensive: Scanning large images or frequent updates can strain resources.
- Complex Setup: Initial configuration (e.g., PostgreSQL, network) can be daunting for beginners.
Best Practices & Recommendations
- Security Tips:
- Use the principle of least privilege for Clair’s database and API access.
- Regularly update Clair to leverage the latest vulnerability data.
- Performance:
- Optimize updater intervals (e.g., 12h) to balance freshness and resource use.
- Use a dedicated PostgreSQL instance for scalability.
- Maintenance:
- Monitor Clair logs for errors in fetching vulnerability data.
- Back up the database to preserve scan history.
- Compliance Alignment:
- Map Clair’s severity levels to compliance requirements (e.g., PCI-DSS, HIPAA).
- Document scan results for audit trails.
- Automation Ideas:
- Integrate Clair with webhooks to notify teams via Slack or email.
- Use GitOps to manage Clair configurations as code.
Comparison with Alternatives
Tool | Clair | Trivy | Anchore |
---|---|---|---|
Type | Open-source, container vulnerability scanner | Open-source, container and file scanner | Open-source, comprehensive image analysis |
Vulnerability Detection | Static, layer-by-layer analysis | Static, supports containers and OS packages | Static, includes policy enforcement |
Integration | CI/CD, Quay, OpenShift | CI/CD, Kubernetes, broad ecosystem | CI/CD, Kubernetes, detailed reporting |
Ease of Setup | Moderate (requires PostgreSQL) | Easy (single binary) | Moderate (complex configuration) |
Strengths | Deep Red Hat integration, notifier | Lightweight, fast, broad language support | Policy-based scanning, compliance focus |
Weaknesses | Static only, setup complexity | Limited runtime analysis | Resource-heavy for large images |
Best Use Case | OpenShift/Quay environments | Quick, lightweight scans | Policy-driven enterprise environments |
When to Choose Clair:
- Ideal for Red Hat OpenShift or Quay users.
- Suitable for teams needing automated notifications for new vulnerabilities.
- Best for environments prioritizing open-source tools with CI/CD integration.
Conclusion
Clair is a powerful tool for securing containerized applications in DevSecOps, enabling early vulnerability detection and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Its open-source nature, robust architecture, and alignment with shift-left security make it a valuable asset for organizations prioritizing secure software delivery. However, its static analysis limitations and setup complexity require careful planning. As container adoption grows, Clair’s role in DevSecOps will likely expand, with potential enhancements in runtime analysis and broader language support.